Quantcast
Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Faculty of Law
QUT Home Law Home LJRC Home LJJ Home
Staff directory Sitemap Contact us
About the Faculty Study Research Community

QUT Law & Justice Journal Vol 1 No 1 2001

Vol11 No 1 2011
Vol10 No 2 2010
Vol10 No 1 2010
Vol 9 No 2 2009
Vol 9 No 1 2009
Vol 8 No 2 2008
Vol 8 No 1 2008
Vol 7 No 2 2007
Vol 7 No 1 2007
Vol 6 No 2 2006
Vol 6 No 1 2006
Vol 5 No 2 2005
Vol 5 No 1 2005
Vol 4 No 2 2004
Vol 4 No 1 2004
Vol 3 No 2 2003
Vol 3 No 1 2003
Vol 2 No 2 2002
Vol 2 No 1 2002
Vol 1 No 2 2001
Vol 1 No 1 2001
  Welcome
  Trustee Investing
  Contracts by email
  * When is a signed document contactual?
  Treaties & Aust Law
  Garcia v NAB and Torrens
  Justice as Desert
  Concurrent Liability
  Coporations Law Act 2000
Book reviews

[Print-friendly version]

ISSN 1445-6249

  Full text of this Article

  Printer version of full article(pdf)

Abstract

When is a Signed Document Contractual? - Taking the 'Fun' out of the 'Funfair'

Bruce Clarke & Steve Kapnoullas

The primary focus of this article is the recent decision of the Victorian Court of Appeal in Le Mans Grand Prix Circuits Pty Ltd v Iliadis, where the court had to consider whether a document signed by the Plaintiff, or the transaction he entered into, was contractual. In so doing, the court had to consider the applicability of the rule in L'Estrange v Graucob relating to signed documents. The fact that the court split 2:1 shows that it is not always easy to determine whether a signed document is contractual.

  Full text of this Article