Quantcast
Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Faculty of Law
QUT Home Law Home LJRC Home LJJ Home
Staff directory Sitemap Contact us
About the Faculty Study Research Community

QUT Law & Justice Journal Vol 1 No 1 2001

Vol11 No 1 2011
Vol10 No 2 2010
Vol10 No 1 2010
Vol 9 No 2 2009
Vol 9 No 1 2009
Vol 8 No 2 2008
Vol 8 No 1 2008
Vol 7 No 2 2007
Vol 7 No 1 2007
Vol 6 No 2 2006
Vol 6 No 1 2006
Vol 5 No 2 2005
Vol 5 No 1 2005
Vol 4 No 2 2004
Vol 4 No 1 2004
Vol 3 No 2 2003
Vol 3 No 1 2003
Vol 2 No 2 2002
Vol 2 No 1 2002
Vol 1 No 2 2001
Vol 1 No 1 2001
  Welcome
  Trustee Investing
  Contracts by email
  When is a signed document contactual?
  Treaties & Aust Law
  Garcia v NAB and Torrens
  * Justice as Desert
  Concurrent Liability
  Coporations Law Act 2000
Book reviews

[Print-friendly version]

ISSN 1445-6249

  Full text of this Article

  Printer version of full article(pdf)

Abstract

Justice as Desert

Louis Pojman

There is an ancient tradition, found in both the mainstream of Western philosophy and religion as well as Eastern thought that justice consists in giving people what they deserve - often rendered as giving each person his or her due. In our day desert, while still recognized by the ordinary person, has been undermined or completely dismissed by the leading political and social philosophers of our time. In this essay, I argue that its dismissal has been premature and while distinguishing "merit" from "desert" argue that both have a central place in moral and political philosophy as defining justice.

  Full text of this Article