Quantcast
Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Faculty of Law
QUT Home Law Home LJRC Home LJJ Home
Staff directory Sitemap Contact us
About the Faculty Study Research Community

QUT Law & Justice Journal Vol 2 No 2 2002

Vol11 No 1 2011
Vol10 No 2 2010
Vol10 No 1 2010
Vol 9 No 2 2009
Vol 9 No 1 2009
Vol 8 No 2 2008
Vol 8 No 1 2008
Vol 7 No 2 2007
Vol 7 No 1 2007
Vol 6 No 2 2006
Vol 6 No 1 2006
Vol 5 No 2 2005
Vol 5 No 1 2005
Vol 4 No 2 2004
Vol 4 No 1 2004
Vol 3 No 2 2003
Vol 3 No 1 2003
Vol 2 No 2 2002
  Evidence law and women
  Mentoring women legal academics
  Judges & academic scholarship
  Praxis & politics of policing
  Duty of a responsible person
  * Intercountry adoptions
  Cameron v the Queen
Book Reviews
Vol 2 No 1 2002
Vol 1 No 2 2001
Vol 1 No 1 2001

[Print-friendly version]

ISSN 1445-6249

  Full text of this Article

  Printer version of full article(pdf)

Abstract

Intercountry Adoptions: In the Best Interests of the Child?

Celica Bojorge

The aim of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of the Convention of Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption made at the Hague on 29 May 1993 ("the Hague Convention") and the Adoption of Children Act 1964(Qld) ("the Queensland Act") which implements the Hague Convention.

The effectiveness of the Hague Convention and the Queensland Act will be examined in light of the objects of the Hague Convention, as outlined in Article 1. The paper will, therefore, focus on the following matters:

  • The establishment of safeguards to ensure intercountry adoptions take place in the best interests of the child;

  • The establishment of a system of cooperation among Contracting States to ensure that those safeguards are respected by delegating duties and responsibilities to both the State of origin and the receiving State; and

  • The recognition in Contracting States of adoptions made in accordance with the Hague Convention.

The paper will also consider post-adoption issues of culture, race, religion and language. Finally, some recommendations will be suggested regarding consent, monitoring and accountability, adoptee's access to information and non-accredited bodies.

  Full text of this Article