Quantcast
Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Faculty of Law
QUT Home Law Home LJRC Home LJJ Home
Staff directory Sitemap Contact us
About the Faculty Study Research Community

When is Plea Bargaining Justified? - QUT Law & Justice Journal Vol 3 No 1 2003

Vol11 No 1 2011
Vol10 No 2 2010
Vol10 No 1 2010
Vol 9 No 2 2009
Vol 9 No 1 2009
Vol 8 No 2 2008
Vol 8 No 1 2008
Vol 7 No 2 2007
Vol 7 No 1 2007
Vol 6 No 2 2006
Vol 6 No 1 2006
Vol 5 No 2 2005
Vol 5 No 1 2005
Vol 4 No 2 2004
Vol 4 No 1 2004
Vol 3 No 2 2003
Vol 3 No 1 2003
  Introduction
  Competition in Technology Markets
  Competition Law in Computing Industry
  Technological Tying in the Computer Industry
  Is There Justice for Women?
  High Court sentencing principles & the PSA
  Aboriginality under the microscope
  Protection of cultural heritage resources
  Double Indemnity - Title Insurance & Torrens
  Gender equality & family laws in S Africa
  * Plea bargaining
  Court reviews of admin decisions
  Reasonableness in sexual harrassment
Book Reviews
Vol 2 No 2 2002
Vol 2 No 1 2002
Vol 1 No 2 2001
Vol 1 No 1 2001

[Print-friendly version]

ISSN 1445-6249

  Full text of this Article

  Printer version of full article(pdf)

Abstract

When is Plea Bargaining Justified?

Paul Gerber

Recent trials in New South Wales, in which several youths agreed to plead "guilty" to charges of rape in return for the Crown Prosecutor agreeing to withhold aggravating facts from the judge when addressing the court on sentencing, resulted in the accused receiving relatively minor sentences of imprisonment. This form of plea bargaining is condemned on the basis that there can be no mitigating circumstances in the crime of rape. It is submitted that the prosecution, by withholding evidence critical on sentencing, deceived the court and was particeps criminis.

  Full text of this Article