Quantcast
Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Faculty of Law
QUT Home Law Home LJRC Home LJJ Home
Staff directory Sitemap Contact us
About the Faculty Study Research Community

QUT Law & Justice Journal Vol 3 No 1 2003

Vol11 No 1 2011
Vol10 No 2 2010
Vol10 No 1 2010
Vol 9 No 2 2009
Vol 9 No 1 2009
Vol 8 No 2 2008
Vol 8 No 1 2008
Vol 7 No 2 2007
Vol 7 No 1 2007
Vol 6 No 2 2006
Vol 6 No 1 2006
Vol 5 No 2 2005
Vol 5 No 1 2005
Vol 4 No 2 2004
Vol 4 No 1 2004
Vol 3 No 2 2003
Vol 3 No 1 2003
  Introduction
  Competition in Technology Markets
  Competition Law in Computing Industry
  Technological Tying in the Computer Industry
  Is There Justice for Women?
  High Court sentencing principles & the PSA
  Aboriginality under the microscope
  Protection of cultural heritage resources
  Double Indemnity - Title Insurance & Torrens
  Gender equality & family laws in S Africa
  Plea bargaining
  Court reviews of admin decisions
  * Reasonableness in sexual harrassment
Book Reviews
Vol 2 No 2 2002
Vol 2 No 1 2002
Vol 1 No 2 2001
Vol 1 No 1 2001

[Print-friendly version]

ISSN 1445-6249

  Full text of this Article

  Printer version of full article(pdf)

Abstract

Concepts of 'Reasonableness' in Sexual Harassment Legislation: Did Queensland get it right?

Fiona Pace *

Which behaviours constitute unlawful sexual harassment and which do not? Attempts by legislatures and judicial decision-makers in various jurisdictions to determine this question have been plagued with difficulties.

The concept of 'reasonableness' as a test for unlawful sexual harassment is a common legislative theme found in all Australian jurisdictions as well as overseas jurisdictions such as the United States.

This paper identifies problems with the concept of reasonableness and its application by judicial decision-makers in sexual harassment cases and examines the position in the United States and federal Australian jurisdiction to illustrate such problems.

The paper concludes with an examination of how the definition of sexual harassment and application of the 'reasonableness' test under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) fares in comparison to the United States and federal Australian jurisdiction.

  Full text of this Article