Quantcast
Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Faculty of Law
QUT Home Law Home LJRC Home LJJ Home
Staff directory Sitemap Contact us
About the Faculty Study Research Community

QUT Law & Justice Journal Vol 3 No 2 2003

Vol11 No 1 2011
Vol10 No 2 2010
Vol10 No 1 2010
Vol 9 No 2 2009
Vol 9 No 1 2009
Vol 8 No 2 2008
Vol 8 No 1 2008
Vol 7 No 2 2007
Vol 7 No 1 2007
Vol 6 No 2 2006
Vol 6 No 1 2006
Vol 5 No 2 2005
Vol 5 No 1 2005
Vol 4 No 2 2004
Vol 4 No 1 2004
Vol 3 No 2 2003
  South African Criminal Justice & Human Rights
  Gay, Lesbian & De Facto Rights and Religious Schools in QLD
  Complaints about Aust Intelligence Orgs & Potential Mediation
  Violence Against Women in the Home
  Rights & Responsibilities of Sperm Donor Fathers in Australian Family Law
  Legal Ethics is (Just) Normal Ethics
  * Spousal Competence and Compellability in Criminal Trials
  Suspension of Queensland Lawyers
  Federal Magistrates Service in Qld Family Law
  Charity Law's Public Benefit Test
Book Reviews
Vol 3 No 1 2003
Vol 2 No 2 2002
Vol 2 No 1 2002
Vol 1 No 2 2001
Vol 1 No 1 2001

[Print-friendly version]

ISSN 1445-6249

  Full text of this Article

  Printer version of full article(pdf)

Abstract

Spousal Competence and Compellability in Criminal Trials in the 21st Century

Wendy Harris

For many centuries a lawfully married spouse of an accused occupied a privileged position in terms of giving evidence against his or her spouse in criminal trials. This paper examines the historical origins and rationales for the special spousal rules relating to competence, compellability and privilege. The paper analyses the continued relevance of these rationales to adult relationships in the 21st century with particular emphasis on the application of these rules to former spouses, de facto spouses, same sex relationships and traditional aboriginal marriages. The approaches taken in the various jurisdictions in Australia are discussed to determine the adoption of the rationales in the relevant legislation and the extent of application outside lawful marriages. The analysis reveals a divergence across Australia as to both approach and the categories of witnesses given special treatment under the competency and compellability rules.

  Full text of this Article