Quantcast
Queensland University of Technology   Brisbane Australia Skip bannerSkip to content A university for the real world - Faculty of Law
QUT Home Law Home LJRC Home LJJ Home
Staff directory Sitemap Contact us
About the Faculty Study Research Community

QUT Law & Justice Journal Vol 4 No 1 2004

Vol11 No 1 2011
Vol10 No 2 2010
Vol10 No 1 2010
Vol 9 No 2 2009
Vol 9 No 1 2009
Vol 8 No 2 2008
Vol 8 No 1 2008
Vol 7 No 2 2007
Vol 7 No 1 2007
Vol 6 No 2 2006
Vol 6 No 1 2006
Vol 5 No 2 2005
Vol 5 No 1 2005
Vol 4 No 2 2004
Vol 4 No 1 2004
  Regional Frameworks For Land Based Sources Of Marine Pollution Control
  * Queensland Government Actions to Compensate Survivors of Institutional Abuse
  Double Effect in the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld)
  Defending Begging Offenders
  Will You Do As I Ask?
  The Prohibition of Online-Casinos in Australia
  Equity - A General Principle of Law Recognised by Civilised Nations?
  Restorative Justice - The Empowerment Model
  Australian Constitutional Landmarks
  Achieving Social Justice: Indigenous Rights and Australia's Future
Book Reviews
Vol 3 No 2 2003
Vol 3 No 1 2003
Vol 2 No 2 2002
Vol 2 No 1 2002
Vol 1 No 2 2001
Vol 1 No 1 2001

[Print-friendly version]

ISSN 1445-6249

  Full text of this Article

  Printer version of full article(pdf)

Abstract

QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT ACTIONS TO COMPENSATE SURVIVORS OF INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE: A CRITICAL AND COMPARATIVE EVALUATION

Ben Mathews

Governments in a number of jurisdictions have responded to revelations of sustained abuse and neglect of children in State institutions by establishing schemes awarding financial compensation to survivors, and amending limitation statutes to enable the commencement of civil proceedings. In 1999, the Forde Commission of Inquiry into Abuse of Children in Queensland Institutions reported a similarly devastating incidence of abuse and neglect, and its recommendations included the establishment by the Queensland government of a monetary compensation scheme. This article contrasts the Queensland government's calculated failure to respond to this recommendation, and its antithetical personal injuries legislation, with the actions of its counterparts.

  Full text of this Article